//Ukraine Faces Pressure as U.S. Pushes for Tougher Terms in Resource Deal//
The Ukrainian government is facing intense pressure from the United States to agree to a revised deal that would grant the U.S. substantial financial control over Ukraine’s natural resources. The new proposal—an updated version of a deal previously rejected by Kyiv—demands that half of Ukraine’s revenues from resource extraction be handed over without providing security guarantees in return.
U.S. Seeks Major Stake in Ukraine’s Resource Wealth
The proposed agreement, dated February 21, 2025, was obtained by The New York Times and confirms that the U.S. has not softened its demands. It still requires Ukraine to yield 50% of its earnings from key industries, including gas, oil, and mineral extraction, as well as revenue from ports and infrastructure.
The deal’s latest iteration introduces even tougher conditions than before. Notably, Ukraine would be required to contribute to a U.S.-controlled fund until it reaches $500 billion—a staggering sum that doubles Ukraine’s pre-war economic output. It remains unclear whether this sum is meant as repayment for past U.S. aid or a condition for future support.
Ukraine had previously rejected a similar deal due to its heavy financial burden and the lack of security guarantees. President Volodymyr Zelensky had hoped that offering the U.S. an economic partnership would persuade President Trump to provide further military aid and security assurances against Russia. However, neither of those requests were met in the latest version of the agreement.
Dispute Over Security Guarantees and Legal Protections
A central issue in the ongoing negotiations is Ukraine’s security. Zelensky has sought assurances from the U.S. that Ukraine would receive protection from future Russian aggression—particularly if a peace deal is reached. The new U.S. proposal fails to offer such guarantees, further deepening Ukraine’s concerns about the deal’s fairness.
Another point of contention was the legal framework governing the agreement. The original version placed the deal under the jurisdiction of a New York court, raising fears that it could weaken Ukraine’s legal standing in case of disputes. The latest draft removes this clause, which may be one of the few concessions made by the U.S. in the negotiations.
High Stakes and Growing Pressure
The U.S. has been pushing Kyiv to finalize the deal quickly, with high-level officials making visits to press Zelensky to sign. Keith Kellogg, Trump’s special envoy to Ukraine and Russia, traveled to Kyiv this week for discussions. Meanwhile, U.S. National Security Adviser Mike Waltz stated,
"President Zelensky is going to sign that deal, and you will see that in the very short term. What better could you have for Ukraine than to be in an economic partnership with the United States?"
However, for many in Ukraine, this so-called "partnership" feels like a financial stronghold, as the U.S. stands to gain significant influence over Ukraine’s most valuable industries.
Implications for Ukraine’s Economy and Postwar Recovery
If signed, the agreement could drastically limit Ukraine’s economic sovereignty. Much of the revenue that would typically fund Ukraine’s military and reconstruction efforts would instead be diverted to a U.S.-controlled fund.
The proposal also includes provisions for resource revenues from Russian-occupied territories, should they be liberated in the future. Under the agreement, Ukraine would be required to contribute 66% of revenues from such territories. This clause is particularly controversial because Ukraine would be paying the U.S. for resources from lands it struggles to reclaim.
Ukraine’s resource-rich Donbas region, which remains under Russian occupation, is at the center of this dispute. If Ukraine regains control of this area, the U.S. would effectively own the majority of its economic output under the proposed agreement.
Strained Relations Between Zelensky and Trump
The tense negotiations have further strained relations between Zelensky and Trump. Over the past week, Trump has made sharp personal attacks on Zelensky, calling him “an unelected dictator”.
Zelensky, in turn, accused Trump of spreading disinformation, particularly after Trump falsely claimed that Ukraine had initiated the war against Russia.
“President Trump is living in a disinformation web,” Zelensky stated, rejecting the U.S. president’s accusations.
This growing rift raises concerns about the future of U.S.-Ukraine relations, especially at a time when Ukraine is heavily reliant on American support for its defense and economic survival.
The fate of the Ukraine-U.S. resource deal remains uncertain. While the agreement could be finalized as early as this weekend, Zelensky’s previous opposition to the terms suggests further delays are possible.
As Ukraine faces unprecedented financial and military challenges, the decision to sign—or reject—the deal will shape the country’s economic and geopolitical future. If Zelensky accepts the agreement, Ukraine will secure some level of U.S. economic investment, but at the cost of losing control over its most valuable assets.
If he refuses, he risks further alienating the Trump administration, potentially jeopardizing future American aid and security support.
With Ukraine’s war effort still ongoing and its postwar future at stake, the coming days will be critical in determining the country’s path forward.
Comments